O'MALLEY, v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia
Summary: The appellant, John Dixon O'Malley was not charged with or convicted of any crime. However, he was issued a summons to determine whether his dog was dangerous pursuant to Virginia Code § 3.2â6540(A) and (B). The jury found OâMalley's dog to be dangerous under the Virginia Code due to attacking and injuring the dog of Randall Powell. OâMalley appealed the trial court decision to the Court of Appeals of Virginia. The Court of Appeals concluded that they did not have jurisdiction over the appeal due to being a court of limited jurisdiction. The Court relied on Virginia Code § 17.1â406(A) which provides that the Court of Appeals' appellate jurisdiction was limited to appeals from final criminal convictions. The Court of Appeals reasoned that no language in Code § 3.2â6540 characterized as criminal the proceeding to identify a canine as a dangerous dog. Therefore, the finding at the trial level that OâMalley's dog was dangerous was civil in nature. Because the finding was civil in nature, the Court of Appeals lacked subject matter jurisdiction over OâMalleyâs appeal and the case was transferred to the Supreme Court of Virginia.