Results
Title | Author | Citation | Alternate Citation | Agency Citation | Summary |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Humane Methods of Slaughter Act: Deficiencies and Proposed Amendments | Jennifer L. Mariucci | 4 Journal of Animal Law 149 (2008) | This note touches on the Humane Methods of Slaughter Act and the deficiencies in the current version that undermine the statute’s intended purpose of ensuring a humane slaughter for all animals. This note analyzes the statute, compares it to comparable statutes from around the world, and suggests alterations to ensure that the statue fulfills its goal. This note also includes proposed statutory language that implements suggested changes. |
||
The Humane Research and Testing Act: Advancing Science by Creating | Paul A. Locke, Mikalah Singer and Thomas Hartung | ALTEX 38(4), 2021 | This letter examines the proposed alternatives to animals in biomedical research and the Humane Research and Testing Act (HRTA) from 2021. | ||
The Hunt Club | Hunt Club | http://www.huntingtop10.com/outfitters/il/ilof3/index.html | This advertisement for "The Hunt Club" indicates it provides lodging, meals, and hunts of waterfowl and big game on its 16,000 preserve. It also adds that it has a "trophy management policy" with regard to hunts of "trophy" deer on a 4,000 acre archery area. |
||
The Inadequate Protection of ANnimals Against Cruel Animal Husbandry Practices Under United States Law | Nicole Fox | 17 Whittier L. Rev. 145 | This article looks at available legal protections for all farmed animals, and recommends that Congress enact stricter animal welfare laws. |
||
THE INJUSTICE OF ANIMAL WELFARE: A REVIEW OF ANIMALS, PROPERTY, AND THE LAW | Priscilla N. Cohn | 2 Animal L. 207 (1996) | This article provides a review of the book "Animals, Property, and the Law." | ||
THE INJUSTICE OF ANIMAL WELFARE: A REVIEW OF ANIMALS, PROPERTY, AND THE LAW | Priscilla N. Cohn | 2 Animal L. 207 (1996) | This article provides a review of the book "Animals, Property, and the Law" by Gary Francione regarding the differences between animal rights and animal welfare. | ||
The Japanese Dolphin Hunts: In Quest Of International Legal Protection For Small Cetaceans | Rachelle Adam | 14 Animal Law 133 (2007) | This article sets out to explore the international legal status of those dolphins targeted by the Japanese drive hunts. It is estimated that over 2,500 small cetaceans—dolphins, porpoises, and small whales—will be killed as a result of the drive hunt, out of a total of over twenty thousand killed annually in Japan by direct catch. Since humans have literally pushed dolphins to the brink of extinction, humans have an ethical duty to stop the cruelty perpetrated against them and to ensure the survival of their species. This ethical duty should be turned into an international legal duty, with a correlated legal right for dolphins to international protection. |
||
The Jaws That Bite, The Claws That Snatch | Joseph K. Scott | 62 LALR 303 (Fall, 2001) | This article explores the incongruity between the recent Louisiana decision in State v. Michels that allowed for the presence of a seemingly vicious dog to sustain the element of "dangerous weapon" in an aggravated sexual battery conviction. Louisiana traditionally only allows inanimate objects to be construed as weapons for dangerous weapons charges. The author suggests the Louisiana judiciary should align itself with the national jurisprudence to allow animate objects be viewed as dangerous weapons for the purpose of criminal prosecutions. |
||
THE KENTUCKY HORSE: THE REALITY VS. THE MYTH AND WHAT COULD BE DONE TO CLOSE THE GAP | Virginia F. Coleman | 21 Animal L. 181 (2015) | The iconic status of the horse in Kentucky belies the bitter reality faced by the vast majority of horses in that state. This Article explains how multiple aspects of the current law enforcement system in the state permit the persistent failure to protect horses against gross neglect and abuse, as exemplified in particular by two case studies. The Kentucky Equine Health and Welfare Council, a legislative construct promoted by its backers as a unique safeguard for Kentucky horses, was in fact ill-suited ab initio for this role and has proved uninterested in it. Although there is no legislative cure for indifference on the part of those charged with enforcing laws against neglect and abuse, there are a number of legislative changes that would improve the now lamentable odds faced by Kentucky's horses. These changes, discussed in Part IV of this Article, are designed to increase the likelihood of action being taken against an offender, including through civil as well as criminal proceedings; secure immediate care for horses which have been victimized and prevent recidivism by offenders; increase the severity of the offense; dampen the current robust market for slaughter horses, and fund the costs inherent in creating a more effective enforcement system. All of the changes proposed are already law in at least some other states-in some instances in many other states--and these existing laws offer a ready model for Kentucky to follow if it so chooses. Although the focus of this Article is on Kentucky, all the legislative recommendations made are more broadly applicable to any state which does not yet have a statute as proposed in place. | ||
THE KITTLES CASE AND ITS AFTERMATH | Joshua Marquis | 2 Animal L. 197 (1996) | This article was adapted from remarks from Joshua Marquis at a symposium held by the Student Animal Legal Defense Fund of Northwestern School of Law of Lewis & Clark College on September 23, 1995 regarding issues affecting domestic and captive animals. |