Richard Keith Rogers v. Teignbridge District Council

Share |
Country of Origin:  United Kingdom Court Name:  Torbay Magistrates' Court Date of Decision: 

Summary:

The magistrates refused the appeal by Mr. Rogers. They gave their reasons for doing so as follows:

1.  One of the statutory definitions of a public place is a place to which the public have access whether they have to pay or not. The Creepy Crawly Show was to be held in a building on Newton Abbot Racecourse. Newton Abbot Racecourse is clearly a public place.

2.  Would the holding of the Creepy Crawly Show in a building on Newton Abbot Racecourse constitute a market? A market is not defined in the Pet Animals Act 1951 as amended but is generally defined as a concourse of buyers and sellers. The buying and selling of animals is an integral but not exclusive feature of the Creepy Crawly Show.

The magistrates therefore concluded that the Creepy Crawly Show was to be held in a public place and in a setting which constituted a market. Section 2 of the Pet Animals Act 1951 as amended states that "If any person carries on a business of selling animals as pets in any part of a street or public place, or at a stall or barrow in a market, he shall be guilty of an offence." In the light of this section of the Pet Animals Act 1951 as amended the magistrates concluded that it would be unlawful for the local authority, i.e. Teignbridge District Council, to grant such a licence and therefore dismissed Mr. Rogers' appeal.

Share |